Jesus: A Life in Class Conflict

Product Information

Of the three last words of Jesus on the cross offered by Mark/Matthew, Luke and John which is historical or does that not matter? This book moves on from the Third Quest for the historical Jesus, so focused on seeing Jesus as a great innovator within a particular cultural, religious and societal context.

Copious and informed material information by way of well-wrought and well-written biographical narrative. Seeing such portraits as romanticized and overly idealized, the interest here is on the social and economic forces that produced the Jesus movement. But is Mark’s story his way of showing that Antipas is a foolish victim of a pretty girl’s charm (Esther 5. Written for a broad audience, it understands the Jesus movement and rise of Christianity without resorting to the usual Great Man view of history and instead pursues a history from below.Crossley and Myles locate Jesus’s class position as that of a tektōn, an ancient Greek noun meaning craftsman or carpenter. Bringing a wealth of knowledge on the social, economic, and cultural conflicts of the time, Crossley and Myles uncover the emergence of a fervent and deadly serious religious organizer.

Nor does the “preferential option for death” accord well with the persistent and emphasised failure of the disciples to accept the message of suffering. Most sciences aim to establish general laws, but the science of history accepts that historical events are unique. Whether you are an academic of the field, a lay Christian, or clergy, you should be reading this volume and seriously considering it. We are part of the pro-democracy media contesting the vast right-wing media propaganda ecosystem brainwashing tens of millions and putting democracy at risk. Jesus: A Life in Class Conflict provides an important refocusing and reprioritizing of earlier Scriptural studies as seen through the lens of historical materialist analysis.

Without such testing, it remains unclear that the Jesus movement was a product of class-conflict and agrarian unrest. The movement’s popular appeal was due in part to a desire to represent the values of ordinary rural workers, and its vision meant that the rich would have to give up their wealth, while the poor would be afforded a life of heavenly luxury.