None Dare Call it Conspiracy

Product Information

There is an accurate poli tical spectrum. (See Chart 2.) Communism is, by definition, total government. If you have total government it makes littl e difference whether you call it Communism, Fascism, Socialism, Caesarism or Pharaohism. It's all pretty much the same from the standpoint of the people who must live and suffer under it. If total government (by any of its pseudonyms) stands on the far Left, then by logic the far Right should represent anarchy, or no government. Blake, Gene. "Watts Riot as Rehearsal for Red Coup Discounted." Los Angeles Times (April 28, 1967), part 2, p. A6. Archived from the original. You can believe anything you want about Communism except that it is a conspiracy run by men from the respectable world. People will often say to an active anti-Communist: “I can understand your concern with Communism, but the idea that a Communist conspiracy is making great inroads in the United States is absurd. The American people are anti-Communist. They’re not about to buy Communism. It’s understandable to be concerned about Communism in Africa or Aisa or South America with their tremendous poverty, ignorance and disease. But to be concerned about Communism in the United States where the vast majority of people have no sympathy with it whatsoever is a misspent concern.” The story you are about to read is true. The names have not been changed to protect the guil ty. This book may have the effect of changing your li fe. After reading this book you will never look at national and world events in the same way again. Probably at some time you have been involved with or had personal knowledge of some event which was reported in the news. Perhaps it concerned an athletic event, an election, a committee or your business. Did the report contain the "real" story, the story behind the story? Probably not. And for a variety of reasons. The reporter had time and space problems and there is a good chance the persons involved deliberately did not reveal all the facts. Possibly the reporter's own prejudices governed what facts went into the story and which were deleted. Our point is that most people know from personal experience that a news story often is not the whole story. But many of us assume that our own case is unique when really it is typical. What is true about the reporting of local events is equally as true about the reporting of national and international events.

Meyer Rothchild became extremely wealthy during the nineteenth century by financing the countries of Europe to fight each other.“They grouped nations so that if any King got out of line a war would break out and the war would be decided by which way the financing went. Researching the debt positions of the warring nations will usually indicate who was to be punished.” What Allen claimed to have discovered was that a plutocracy of 3% of the population covertly controlled the lives of the rest.They had wrested control of the constitutional republic, with its separation of powers, limited government, and competitive free enterprise, and turned it into a system of centralized control by a few.How was this achieved?According to Allen, the conspiratorial clique was hidden and protected by a complicit media establishment they own and control.Also, they are accomplished liars and farseeing planners.Their subversive tour de force has been to advance the lies that a) communism is inevitable and b) communism is a movement of the downtrodden.The first lie aims to destroy the will to fight, the second to gain the support of the poor masses and justify the destruction of a vigorous, innovative middle class. Wether you are very wealthy or a pauper, unless you are a member of the Establishment, you are ultimately their victim.Since all Communists and their Insider bosses are waging a constant struggle for SOCIALISM, let us define that term. Socialism is usually denned as government ownership and/or control over the basic means of production and distribution of goods and services. When analyzed this means government control over everything, including you. All controls are "people" controls. If the government controls these areas it can eventually do just exactly as Marx set out to do-destroy the right to private property, eliminate the family and wipe out religion.

I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret records. I HAVE NO AVERSION TO IT OR TO MOST OF ITS AIMS AND HAVE, FOR MUCH OF MY LIFE, BEEN CLOSE TO IT AND TO MANY OF ITS INSTRUMENTS. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies ... but in general my chief difference of opinion is that IT WISHES TO REMAIN UNKNOWN, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known." (Emphasis added) This furiously, elaborately suspicious way of understanding the world started spreading across the political spectrum after the assassination of John Kennedy in 1963. But the shift in American thinking wasn’t registered immediately. In his essay “The Paranoid Style in American Politics,” published a year after the president’s murder, Richard Hofstadter devoted only a single sentence and footnote to JFK conspiracies, observing that “conspiratorial explanations of Kennedy’s assassination” don’t have much “currency … in the United States.” Elaborate paranoia was more of an established tic of the Bircherite far right, but because those folks fanatically despised Kennedy, they weren’t motivated to believe in a conspiracy to assassinate him. Similarly, we know that a man named Vladimir Ilich Lenin also existed. Like Hitler, Lenin did not spring from a family of social li ons. The son of a petty bureaucrat, Lenin, who spent most of his adult li fe in poverty, has been responsible for the deaths of tens of milli ons of your fellow human beings and the enslavement of nearly a billi on more. Like Hitler, Lenin sat up nights in a dank garret scheming how he could conquer the world. We know that too. Toward a National Growth Policy: Federal and State Developments in 1973. Prepared by the Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress. Foreword by U.S. Senator Hubert H. Humphrey. Washington: Government Printing Office (December 27, 1974), p. 330.The financiers know that the key to controlling a government is to control its money supply, and the central banks of the various European nations such as the Bank of England, Bank of France, and Bank of Germany were not owned by their respective countries as they appear to be due to their names, but rather they are privately owned monopolies. large counter-revolutionary base in 1972 the ball game will be lost by 1976. MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN

Is it not theoretically possible that a billi onaire could be sitting, not in a garret, but in a penthouse, in Manhattan, London or Paris and dream the same dream as Lenin and Hitler? You will have to admit it is theoretically possible. Julius Caesar, a wealthy aristocrat, did. And such a man might form an alli ance or association with other li ke-minded men, might he not? Caesar did. These men would be superbly educated, command immense social prestige and be able to pool astonishing amounts of money to carry out their purposes. These are advantages that Hitler and Lenin did not have. Chart 1 depicts a false Left-Right politi cal spectrum used by Liberals which has Communism (International Socialism) on the far Left and its twin, Fascism (National Socialism) on the far Right with the "middle of the road" being Fabian Socialism. The entire spectrum is Socialist! Economics Professor Stuart Crane notes that there are two means used to collateralize loans to governments and kings. Whenever a business firm borrows big money its creditor obtains a voice in management to protect his investment. Like a business, no government can borrow big money unless willi ng to surrender to the creditor some measure of sovereignty as collateral. Certainly international bankers who have loaned hundreds of billi ons of dollars to governments around the world command considerable influence in the policies of such governments. dicta t6rship through stark terror. The terror does not end with the complete take-over of the Republic. Rather, then Next we ask: "Well then, do you think socialism is inevitable in America?'' The answer, in almost every case will be similar to this: "I'm no socialist, you understand, but I see what is going on in this country. Yeah, I'd have to say that socialism is inevitable."Hidden History Conspiracy Primers Protocols Freemasonry Conspiracy Classics World Wars Canaanites Wars and Revolutions Advanced Topics Conspiracy to seize the power of government is as old as government itself. We can study the conspiracies surrounding Alcibiades in Greece or Julius Caesar in ancient Rome, but we are not supposed to think that men today scheme to achieve politi cal power.