Intel Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+) Desktop Kit, AX200, 2230, 2x2 AX+BT, vPro

Product Information

Term. This Agreement begins upon Your acceptance of its terms and continues until terminated under Sections 3 or 10.2. Intel classifications are for general, educational and planning purposes only and consist of Export Control Classification Numbers (ECCN) and Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) numbers. Any use made of Intel classifications are without recourse to Intel and shall not be construed as a representation or warranty regarding the proper ECCN or HTS. Your company as an importer and/or exporter is responsible for determining the correct classification of your transaction.

From here on, I’ll be showing only results using the AX200 w/ Windows driver to measure Wi-Fi 6 performance and Qualcomm-based Pal to show what a two-stream N/AC STA can do. Governing Law; Jurisdiction. This Agreement is governed by USA and Delaware law without regard to conflict of laws principles. The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods does not apply. Except for claims for misappropriation of trade secrets or breach of confidentiality obligations, all disputes and actions arising out of or related to this Agreement are subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts in Wilmington, Delaware and you consent to personal jurisdiction in those courts. The 2.4 GHz downlink plot shows the expected 2X throughput gain (actually better) from the AX200 using the Windows driver. But performance with the Linux driver is significantly lower, running somewhere between the AX200 / Win 10 and octoScope Pal24 plots at low-to-medium attenuation values. Things settle down at the 48 dB attenuation mark and are more predictable after that. The AX200 shows it’s a superior adapter than the Qualcomm-based Pal24 from 57 dB attenuation onward and finally matches the Windows 10 driver from 69 dB on. If you can verify that, and the PC still doesn’t see the SSID of your WiFi6 network, you may want to peek at your desktop computer more closely… Broadband: Fiber-optic ONT vs Cable modem (DOCSIS 3.0 vs 3.1)| How to activate a Cable modem| Broadband troubleshooting| 10Gbps Internet | Tips for an ISP-provided gatewayThere was no throughput gain observed from AX vs. AC when using 5 GHz. Even though our test STA got the expected 1201 Mbps link rate with all routers with the strongest signal, this did not translate to higher throughput. In fact, both AC and AX STAs were only able to get 700 Mbps at most and usually below that. 5 GHz uplink with the AC STA actually produced the highest throughput!

I tested the five draft AX routers for this go-around, shown in Table 1, three based on Broadcom’s AX platform, one on Qualcomm’s and one Intel based. NO WARRANTY. The Materials are provided “as is,” without any express or implied warranty of any kind including warranties of merchantability, non-infringement, title, or fitness for a particular purpose. The Materials may include pre-release software or algorithms and may not be fully functional. Intel is not required to maintain, update, or support the Materials.

Phiên bản Bluetooth

Severability. If a court holds a provision of this Agreement unenforceable, the court will modify that part to the minimum extent necessary to make that part enforceable or, if necessary, to sever that part. The rest of the provision remains fully enforceable. The 2.4 GHz uplink plot shows an even greater throughput advantage between AX and AC STA, as well as a better-behaved curve. We also once again see the AX200 outperform the Qualcomm-based Pal24 at attenuations beyond 54 dB.