The VideoMic Me-L performed well throughout my tests, and in certain instances it is significantly better than the built in iPhone mic. You will benefit most from the VideoMic Me-L when using it at close range or outdoors when combined with the windshield. At arms-length though I struggled to hear a significant difference between the Rode mic and the built-in phone mic when using it indoors, although again when outdoors the Rode wins hands-down. The VideoMic Me-L also does a much better job of cutting out ambient noise, being a more directional mic than the iPhone. Inclusion of any digital resource is not an endorsement of a particular point of view or philosophy by the Library of Michigan. In parallel and sometimes in collaboration, catalyst organizations including USAID are supporting the implementation of partnerships and innovative activities on a broad-spectrum of challenges – from sustainable fisheries management, inclusive digital access, women’s empowerment, and Water Access, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH), among others. As private sector clients embark on more challenging sustainability commitments and other impact programs across their supply chains, MEL provides organizational change managers and leaders with tools to connect intended impact initiatives with other business outcomes.

Libraries - City of Melbourne

Given this breadth of experience and depth of expertise, we cull and customize innovative tools and approaches for clients as part of our MEL design based on ongoing assessment and asking the right questions.By its nature, MEL compels organizations to become detail-orientated and specific. For example, Resonance has been working with a company consortium from The Sustainable Agriculture Initiative (SAI) platform—including leading multinational agribusinesses such as PepsiCo, Nestlé, and Ingredion—to build pre-competitive and cross-sector partnerships that advance sustainable agricultural supply chains in Pakistan. Practitioners and facilitators should be mindful of ways in which the components of MEL may be enhanced with the integration of a theory of change, for example; likewise, organizational changemakers should be attentive to the way tailored approaches to monitoring, evaluation, and the willingness to integrate learning for initiative improvement, can help build a case for change or innovation. Internalizing MEL is Important Many government agencies, NGOs, and large multinational companies have in place robust and systemic MEL frameworks across their organizations and supply and values chains; others may use facets or components without calling it MEL explicitly. What is a MEL Framework? And since leading and managing change is critical to success, how do you envision the links between these new activities to your goals? Who will benefit, who will be most impacted, how will it happen, and who will be responsible and involved? What is the challenge, how do you define it, and who does it impact in terms of intended and unintended stakeholders? Has this challenge shifted or changed?

MEL - What does MEL stand for? The Free Dictionary

Do you anticipate the implementation of new processes and initiatives designed to meet those goals, and will they ultimately and unavoidably drive change within the organization? What does change look like in six months? A year? Two years? At the end of the initiative? At the core, MEL is a system or cycle with all three components, monitoring, evaluation, and learning, working in tandem and as a thread through all project and program phases – from early design through implementation and completion. In this case, it would be too vague to state as goals, “In five years, through this grant we’ll make that organization sustainable,” or “Through this one-day training program, farmers in Pakistan will transition their farms to regenerative agriculture.” These are too broad and are thus difficult to measure.We take the information we have collected to the team to provide a comprehensive picture. This would include foundationally: We also completed in 2021 a phased monitoring and evaluation (M&E) initiative for the Department of State’s Bureau of Counterterrorism (DOS/CT), conducting real-time evaluations while simultaneously building the capacity of the Congressionally approved Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund (CTPF) to help foreign government partners more effectively counter terrorism and violent extremism. Important in this process of learning, organizations are prompted through a series of questions to try to pinpoint and contextualize through their insights and expertise what they think might hindering successful goal attainment.