About this deal
The “Originals” Desert Boot has nothing – you can clearly see the shaved down flesh side of the leather hide here, which tells you Clarks is using top grain hide splits. The Bushacre 2 has a lightly padded footbed for additional comfort, however, the boot itself is still pretty flat inside. Arch Support: These boots do not have much arch support, so they might not be the best choice for people with foot problems or who need extra support. The Clarks Bushacre 3 has a rubber sole, which is more durable and provides better traction on slippery surfaces.
Clarks Bushacre 2 vs Clarks Bushacre 3 (Complete Guide) Clarks Bushacre 2 vs Clarks Bushacre 3 (Complete Guide)
Although the two look similar, there are key distinctions that set them apart—these will also tell you whether or not the footwear fits your lifestyle. However, Clarks made the Bushacre 2 available in suede as well, though the dark brown leather Bushacre 2 is the most popular choice by far.The heel slip disappeared after about five wears, so that goes to show how quickly the leather adapts. The soft crepe sole of the original Clarks Desert Boot sucks up dirt and water like nobody’s business. Another difference between the Desert Boots and the Bushacre 2 is the leather used in the manufacturing of the upper.
Clarks Bushacre 2 Review: Is it Better Than the Original? Clarks Bushacre 2 Review: Is it Better Than the Original?
The same can be said about Bushacre 3 as well, however, it has a sturdier material which can be more durable in the long run. The Desert Boot 2 and the Bushacre 3, being the newest models in Clark’s stable, have removable foam insoles which make a HUUUGE impact on comfort as compared to the older styles.
The crepe outsole on the Desert boots, while perfectly at home in the Bazaars of Cairo, does take a beating on pavement. The Desert Boot 2 takes regular natural rubber soles and adds more traction with rougher sections at the heel and forefoot.